Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Tue, 08 Dec 1998, Bud Cook wrote: >Someone recently asked Doug Herr about telephoto lenses for >photographing animals. This got me to thinking about my experiences >over the years. > >After giving it some thought, I'm surprised to find that a great many of >the wildlife photographs that I value the most were taken with >relatively short lenses and most often taken with an M Leica rather than >with Nikon F's or Leicaflexes. > >Perhaps these are simply the photographs that bring back the most >pleasant memories. > >I remember a charging black bear in Yellowstone where all the people >around me scrambled to get to safety by piling into the open door of a >motor home. I held my ground with my trusty M2 and Rigid Summicron and >the bear stopped in time to allow me to take his picture. > <SNIP> >I've taken photos of bear and other mammals with long telephoto lenses >but they don't seem as important to me as those that allowed me to get >up close and personal. > >I won't continue to bore everyone but I wanted to point out that >successfully photographing wild animals is sometimes simply a matter of >getting close and that you don't always need specialized equipment to >bring back a trophy. Bud, You're right, lots of specialized equipment isn't really nessesary. I've seen a photographer use a 50mm lens with 2x converter, hiding under an old army blanket, make some truly remarkable bird photographs, but his technique was exceptional. Now that I think about it I used a 24mm lens a couple of times on Arctic Terns and Long-tailed Jaegers in Alaska. At the time I was a neophyte photographer who valued the image more than I valued the birds. I was standing too close to their nests and the birds were attacking me to defend the nests. None of the incidents you mentioned suggests deliberate harassment such as I had done with the terns and jaegers. I do want to caution others, though, not to depend on getting really close to animals with normal-ish lenses as the animals may feel threatened and might attack. In the US National Parks, a bear that attacks a human for whatever reason is considered a problem bear and will be removed or killed to prevent further attacks. It took me several years to understand that the animals' welfare is more important than my photographs. I still use the shorter lenses where appropriate but more often than not a respectful distance is in the best interest of the animal. Doug Herr Sacramento