Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]So far I have had only one problem with the new Leica equipment I have purchased and that was the new M polarizer. It fell apart and it took Leica, NJ, six weeks to screw it back together. On the same vein of QC, a friend of mine purchased a new 28-70 2.8 L Canon lens today and had to take it back because of a big black speck on the internal elements. Leica isn't the only one with QC problems. Bruce Burnett - ----- Original Message ----- From: B. D. Colen <BDColen@earthlink.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Monday, December 07, 1998 10:10 AM Subject: RE: [Leica] Unreliable Leica or unreliable user ? >> I think we all have expected a little too much from Leitz >> (Leica) as the name >> Leica had been called legendary. That might be why we all have >> made moutains >> out of molehills when we had a problem or two. We are all living >> in a world >> of uncertainty. >> >But one thing is certain - the mole hill of problems costs a mountain of >cash. You buy a Ford - or even a Lexus - and you expect a few problems. You >buy a Rolls Royce, and you expect perfection. It's part of what you're >paying for. > >