Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Unreliable Leica or unreliable user ?
From: "Bruce Burnett" <bburnett@bitcorp.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 21:55:44 -0700

So far I have had only one problem with the new Leica equipment I have
purchased and that was the new M polarizer.  It fell apart and it took
Leica,
NJ, six weeks to screw it back together.  On the same vein of QC, a friend
of mine purchased a new 28-70 2.8 L Canon lens today and had to take it back
because of a big black speck on the internal elements.  Leica isn't the only
one with QC problems.
Bruce Burnett
- ----- Original Message -----
From: B. D. Colen <BDColen@earthlink.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, December 07, 1998 10:10 AM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Unreliable Leica or unreliable user ?


>>  I think we all have expected a little too much from Leitz
>> (Leica) as the name
>> Leica had been called legendary.  That might be why we all have
>> made moutains
>> out of molehills when we had a problem or two.  We are all living
>> in a world
>> of uncertainty.
>>
>But one thing is certain - the mole hill of problems costs a mountain of
>cash. You buy a Ford - or even a Lexus - and you expect a few problems. You
>buy a Rolls Royce, and you expect perfection. It's part of what you're
>paying for.
>
>