Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I realize that this is a Leica list, but I trust your experience more than any other list. So, here goes a (somewhat) off-topic question: I'm considering Leica R (for obvious reasons), but I'm not too fond of the (IMO) rather underspecified bodies. Canon FD offers a nice balance with the F1N and T90 between traditional and high-tech, but I'm not sure of the bokeh of the FD lenses. Contax lenses appear very good, with brilliant bokeh, the bodies are well specified, but they are hard to find on the SH market. Bokeh is extremely important to me, along with sharpness, but (unfortunately) price is also a consideration. I will primarily be buying second-hand stuff. I have an M-system (slowly in the making ;) which I intend to use for wide-angle stuff mainly. I wish to build an SLR system too, for use with focal lengths of 135mm and longer. I'm looking towards a 135, 180, 300 and possibly 400mm lenses. I'll probably get a 50mm and 100mm macro too, at some stage. I will need (reasonably) sophisticated flash capabilities. So, could those of you who have *experience* of Leica R, Canon FD and/or Contax please comment on the optical and mechanical properties of these systems. Since this is off-topic and likely to induce a marque- territorial religious flame war, personal email replies may be the better way to go ;-) M. - -- Martin V. Howard, Application Systems Laboratory, | Dept. of Comp. & Info. Sci., Linkoping University, | Just "DOHH" it! SE-581 83 Linkoping, Sweden. Tel +46 13 282 421, +----------------+ Fax +46 13 142 231; marho@ida.liu.se; www.ida.liu.se/~marho