Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jorge You wrote: >>I am thinking seriously about the 90/2.0 ASHP (I may trade the 80/1.4) but, if when used at f/2.0 it is beyond the M6 rangefinder accuracy limit, is it worth buying it ? , should I go for the elmarit ?<< I've recently gone back and evaluated my archived slides and negatives. I've recognized some tendancies; such as that I have more focusing errors in dynamic subjects and when using longer lenses. Really no surprise there. This little endeavor has strengthened my belief that the M is difficult to use with lenses longer than 50mm. That difficulty is magnified the closer the subject and the wider the aperture. It may not be as bad with the HM viewfinders. I don't know since I don't own one. I do have an M3, though, as well as an M6 and M4-P. I see the same problems when using my M3. I once had six 90mm M lenses. I'm down to 2 and I'll soon be down to one. I just don't use them. It's difficult enough using my 50/1.4 Summilux M at wide apertures. The numbers which represent theoretical focusing accuracy are interesting, but in practical terms, they don't mean a whole lot to me. The subject matter and conditions under which I plan to use the lens are much more relevant. A 90 M lens would seem to be ideal for informal portraits in low light. But in that situation the subject is moving and I'm moving. I can't prefocus. I'm using wide apertures. All of which leads to a high percentage of focusing errors. If I have to spend an inordinate amount of time focusing I lose the value of using an M, which is spontaneity and unobtrusiveness. I'm better off using an SLR. If I were in your shoes I'd think twice about replacing my 80/1.4 R with an 90/2 M ASHP, regardless of the quality of the latter. Of course, if you use the M differently than me (for example, I know people who use longer lenses primarily for landscape work where subjects are distant and accurate focusing is possible) then my comments aren't applicable. BTW, I'd love to own an 80/1.4 R. Dave