Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/12/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B.D. You wrote: >>However, dare I question whether you're producing some soft images because your eyes aren't what they were when last you used manual focus?<< I'm extremely fortunate. I still have 20/20 vision. It's strictly a case of not paying enough attention. For example, I was printing a portrait last night. It was taken with a 90/2 Summicron. I'm not sure of the aperture, but I'm guessing the it was taken at f4. The subjects eyes were ok for 5x7. But they lost a bit in an 11X14. OTOH,the fingernails, which were approx 6 inches closer to the lens, were still tack sharp in the big print. I missed focus by about 6 inches. I ruled out a mechanical problem. This wasn't a big deal. Viewed from a normal distance you probably wouldn't notice. It was more an indictment of my technique. More to the point, I own some pretty good lenses. And I'm leaning toward buying yet another. But it's really somewhat ludicrous if I don't have excellent technique. Focusing is a big part of that. Most lenses are good at f8, and focus isn't as critical. I want to develop more skill using the widest apertures. Ironically, with the same carelessness autofocus could easily have locked onto the hand, which was at the center of the frame. So autofocus isn't the answer. It's a matter of awareness and attention to good technique (which I seem to have lost on more than one occasion). The nice thing about owning quality equipment is that it should heighten awareness regarding technique. If I'm shooting a crappy lens what does it matter if my point of focus is a little off? IOW, better equipment should hold us more accountable. Dave