Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Roy, The second version isn't an option for me. It's got to fit my Leicaflexes. Bud Roy Zartarian wrote: > I've got the earlier version. First off, it's one big heavy piece of > equipment. Second, despite a threading of 82 mm, Leica recommended > against the use of filters - the newer version has an internal filter > turret. That may be a consideration if you think you'll need, for > example, an FL-D or a polarizer. I did try an appropriately sized > UVa filter but found that the filter glass would touch the protruding > front element. The filter was hastily returned for a refund. > > As for vignetting, I've seen only a slight hint in a couple of negs > where the lens was wide open, but given the scene I was shooting, I'm > not sure whether the "dark" was part of the shadows in the > environment itself. Angular distortion at the edges comes with the > territory with this focal length - the same sort of thing appeared > with a Nikon 20mm. > > Roy > > On 29 Nov 98 at 11:41, budcook@ibm.net wrote: > > > I've been interested in this lens for some time but since I have > > only Leicaflexes, the current version won't work for me. > > > > Are there any showstopper defects in the first version with the > > cams? Vignetting, distortion, soft edges, other? > > > > TIA, > > Bud > > > > > > > Roy C. Zartarian >