Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>So again this is only circomstantial evidence (Marc I need help here) but >it shows that testing beased on a very few samples (at least in the Leica >world) has some validity. Yes, Erwin, I think you're right. Most of those tests are most likely good and representative. But when a test goes against the general assessment people might have on a particular lens, then I think they ought to suspect the test, not the people who seem to agree it's right or wrong. Over the years, I've tested enough Nikon, Canon and Leica lenses (throw in some Pentaxes and others) to know that by sticking with Leica, I get what I want on film. Is there anything wrong with that reasoning? I don't think so. So far, my theory holds up pretty good. - -- Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch The world's full of apathy, and I don't care.