Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mary Grace wrote: > As long as we are getting things off our chests (bosoms?) - wouldn't it > be nice if some LUGgers would be considerate enough to use a name > to identify whom they are quoting instead of using the auto "you wrote." > To say that your "program does it automatically" is no excuse for what > I consider rudeness & ignorance by a fellow Leica user. > NO ARCHIVE>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Mary Grace, Not something I do, "you wrote," as I quote the writer of a post (if at all possible), as it then identifies whom I'm specifically responding to. Besides, as you point out, there is a politness element. So that being the case, let me ask you a question seeing that all of a sudden folks are getting on the "NO ARCHIVE" thing. What or why would you put in your post, "NO ARCHIVE"? Is there something very significant for not archiving? Or have I miss quoted you? Please don't be offended, as I ask simply because I see a number of LUGGITES using the "NO ARCHIVE" tag line to their posts, quite frankly on words with no significant meaning whatsoever! :) I mean like, I've posted some incredible drival here over the past few years (lots will agree!) :) and if that has been archived I'm actually honoured to have it happen, as I rarely considered anything I wrote worth archiving in the first place. :) No one in the future reading my posts would consider that a rashionally (?):) intelligent human being would have written them in the first place. :) But then some on the LUG do not consider me rash nor intelligent with some of my wild and wooly posts! :) Ted Grant This is Our Work. The Legacy of Sir William Osler. http://www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant