Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My seven groszy-worth to the filter debate Walter S Delesandri wrote: > In fact, after dropping my 35 1.4 (in a quiet courtroom, no less) > and > denting the front ring, I'd say that the filter is worth it > just to protect the front flange! I have a fine collection of filters with dented rings that prove just this. Especially when our son got old enough to reach in my camera cabinet and pull items off (it's several feet to the wooden floor). Despite dinged filters, all lenses remain perfect. Worst case: dropping year-old 50mm Summicron-M into a muddy puddle. Lots of TLC got the crud out of the focusing and aperture rings, rear lens cap and UV filter kept crud off glass. Result: lens still like new. > I also feel better wiping rain or dirt off the UV filter with my dirty > golf shirt!! An argument not hitherto aired. I'm another outerwear filter-wiper > As I stated before, when I go to a national park with plenty > of time and shoot with a tripod and slow film, I remove the > filter to get that "Leica" edge (or Nikon, for that matter) > But for day to day "reportage", I'll keep my UV-s, thanks! Gentlemen, I feel this concludes the filters debate