Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have seen and used the Pentax zoom loupe. It is awesome, but expensive. Regards, Robert At 02:13 PM 11/19/98 EST, you wrote: >Nathan: > >I have been using a Schneider 4x Lupe for several year and would evaluate it >as sharp but nothing special. It is, in my opinion too light and the viewing >area rather smallish. Just last week I purchased a Pentax 5.5x lupe that is >a real joy to use. The viewing lense on the Pentax is 2 inches wide compared >to 1-3/8 inches for the Schneider. I would judge the weight of the Pentax to >be at least twice that of the Schneider. I have been using it for both 35 and >6x6 formats. It is heavy enough to hold the negatives flat and the surface of >the lupe that touches the negative is very smooth. I don't remember what I >paid for the Schneider but I think it was around $160. compared to around $135 >for the Pentax. The Pentax is worth twice the Schneider. Although I >haven't seen the ZOOM Pentax Lupe it has got to be a really nice item. Please >don't hold me to it but I think that it zooms from 5 to 10 or 12x. I would >suggest that you check the Pentax before you make a decision. I haven't seen >the Leica as a comparison. > >Happy hunting, >Bob Bedwell > ><< I am in search for the perfect loupe with which to scrutinize my slides > and negatives on the light table. I currently have two Horizon loupes, a > 4x which is nice as it covers the entire slide, and a 10x which is nice > because of the higher magnification but it does not cover the entire > image. I am looking for something with a higher magnification than 4x > that can also cover the image. There is Leica's recent 5x offering, and > Schneider's 6x loupe. Any opinions, are there any other brands I should > consider? > > TIA. > > Nathan > >> > > > >