Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Just curious ! I have done a lot of aerial photography from a Cardinal RG (usually with a Hassey EL) Why would you be shooting from the tail of a 210 ?? Bob Doug Herr wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 1998, Gary Todoroff, > Subject: [Leica] > > > I am setting up for fixed wing flying with the cameras mounted in the > tail of a Cessna >210. > > > >So. . . would an R3 with winder do a decent job? Concerns are: > > > > - Cold temperatures in the air, perhaps down to 10 degrees F. > > - Ability to run a 15 foot shutter release from the cockpit back to > the R3 > >(or is there some kind of an electronic release?) > > > < - General reliability of the R3/winder combination, especially > hanging out > >in the wind at up to 160mph? > > > > > >Does anyone have any thoughts on this somewhat unusual application? Thanks > >for any ideas. > > Gary, > > My experience is with R4s, R4sP and the R4- and R-winders. I don't know > whether this applies to the R3 as well.; you may also want to consider the > R4s. There are long electric releases available for the R-winders. My > primary concern would be batteries freezing up. There is an adapter for > external power supply for the R-winder than can be plugged into a standard > winder battery pack or (I presume) a more substantial power supply. Given > the distance from the 210's (warm?) cabin to the tail I'd guess a larger > power supply would be more reliable. > > My inclination would be to make damn sure the camera is reliable regardless > of the cost 'cuz flight time can get real expensive real fast and ya don't > want to re-do 'cuz of camera failure. Of course, if you're not paying for > the flight time and you enjoy the ride a re-do can be a real benefit <g>. > > BTW, I have enjoyed your posts on this project. Keem 'em coming. > > Doug Herr > Sacramento