Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 06-11-1998 01:02 Eric Welch wrote: > >Well, I think maybe one was a Minolta. But most were Panasonic, weren't >they? Either way, I don't count them as SERIOUS Leicas. :-) I wouldn't dare to discount the Minilux or Minilux Zoom as serious Leicas. Of course, they are not conventional Leicas in the sense the M and R are. But they fit the bill perfectly for what they are meant. Following such reasoning you could aslo say that the Nikon 35 and 28 Ti are not serious Nikons... ;-) Pascal - -------------------------------------------------------- Check out: http://members.xoom.com/cyberplace/ - -------------------------------------------------------- Macintosh PowerBook G3 - it eats Pentium notebooks for lunch - -------------------------------------------------------- <<< PGP public key available on request >>>