Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Scott >>Tech Pan is supposed to be awesome, but a pain. (Anyone care to elaborate on this one?)<< I've seen Tech Pan prints that were nothing short of phenominal in terms of accutance and lack of apparent grain. I met a retired architect who now makes a living in photography. He uses only 35mm and Tech Pan. He develops it in C-41 chemistry with modified processing. He claims it's easier than using standard b/w developers. (He also uses a rotory processor) He uses Olympus equipment (nothing longer than 50mm). He prints 20X24 most of the time. Until I learned otherwise I assumed he used 4X5. As someone who has a brick of (now outdated) Tech Pan in the freezer and more than enough Technidol to process all of it, my hat is off to anyone who can live with slow film. I hate to carry a tripod. Dave