Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/11/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Alastair, I have seen your site and I think you definitly "get it". You get in close and photograph what you intend to photograph and do convey the beauty of your subjects. And there is always hope. I am not too good with words...but what I was trying to say was that far too often people have a hard time grasping the concept that the camera does not "see" what you are "seeing". Some people show me their photos and say this is what I was shooting a photo of and it is some small thing in the center of the photo surrounded by a country mile of empty non informative space. GET CLOSER I want to scream at them. If you are shooting a photo of your kid playing with a ball in the yard get the finder filled with the kid and ball, not the kid, ball , house, the neighbors house, and the damn moon also! I try to tell people that you have to make the camera see what you are seeing. I think everyone has the ability to recognize beauty in the world around them (Keeping in mind that what is beautiful to me is ulgy to another). Just many people have a hard time learning how to capture that beauty on film. Some do it very well and almost instictively, others just never seem to be able to learn how to do it. I know people who are total tech heads when it comes to photography, they can talk about D-Max of films and other things way over my head all day long, but their photos are just, well, boring. Understanding the technical stuff is important, but recognizing what moves you to make the photo and taking a photo of just that thing, be it the light, expression, composition, or whatever is much more improtant than which film has the highest resolution finest grain, ect. Alastair Firkin wrote >Oh dear Harrison ---- you mean there's no hope ;-) Harrison McClary http://people.delphi.com/hmphoto new book at http://www.volmania.com