Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]"Diego, I'm glad that you have spoken up, and hope you will add many more observations in the future. I've read about the Multigraph, and it sounds marvelous. However, I think that I can get to a working print in less than--or about--five minutes useing a 1959 Omega D2 with no timer (I use a metronome). I can generally look at my negatives and gestimate well enough to get a test strip. Then it's a simple step to a working print. I have spent a lot of time in the darkroom, and would love to have a fancy enlarger, but for the present there are other lens and gadgets that I will get first. Cheers, Joe Stephenson" Joe, my advise is addressed to people who does not practice so often in the darkroom to be able to make a quick evaluation of time and grade to be used; I know a professional printer who works better than Multigraph, but he spents 10 hours a day in the the darkroom. I know that find the exact exposure time could be easy, but it happends so many times to me to discover, the morning after, under the daylight, that the contrast that seemed to me correct at night was not satisfying, that I needed some technical aid to rely upon. The contrast suggested by the probe sometimes surprises me, and this is for me the best evidence that also in that case I should have work on a print with an incorrect contrast. A step forward. With the probe (that has a spot sensitive area) you can work as with the Zone System, but in printing: you can choose, within the negative, to reveal all the tones, from black to white, by moving the probe all over the projected picture, or you can prefere to have the full range of greys only in a limited area (e.g.: the face in a portrait) and to have more zones under or over exposed, then you will insist with the probe only in this zone. You are right: everybody, especially the frequent printers, can avoid this expense, but Multigraph will make you faster, and probably will also show you some new ways of printing, in order to obtain the maximum from your negative with a reasonable effort and time. Lucky who can do the same by the means of his experience. Bye. Diego