Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> << I have heard very little discussion regarding 135mm lenses, M > and R, here. Do people on this list still use the 135mm lenses > anymore? >> > > The 135 focal length is my favorite. Yes, we still use them! Well, I plan to this weekend, anyway. I just picked up a Hektor 135/4.5 for $80 at a show last Sunday. It's a good user lens, smooth aperture action, focusing is mildly stiff, and the glass looks "okay". I can't wait to try it out. If the glass proves to be really poor, I can always replace the lens head, I assume. It's in a screw mount, so I'll be using on the IIIf and the M6 body. For some reason, I get a different sense of satisfaction (maybe even greater) out of acquiring that lens that I do from a more modern one costing over ten times as much. I was excited to show my wife this great "find" when I returned, and she was equally excited to show me a pair of "Bally" shoes she bought at a thrift strore for $7.99. As you may have guessed, neither of us quite understood the other! I've never rushed home to tell her about the more expensive purchases... I bought it primarily for Viso/Bellows macro work (now I need to find those), but as it's my only 135, I'm sure I'll be using it for other purposes. Is anyone parting with a Viso/Bellows setup that I could use on an M6 or IIIf? Andrew