Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>>On a related issue, I scan all of my B&W negatives. Do any of you >>develop B&W film differently for digital processing than you would for >>"wet" enlarging? I wonder if increasing the contrast digitally has >>more of an impact in terms of loss of highlight and shadow detail ( or >>tonality) than would be the case with a conventional print. If that >>is the case, and it is just a guess, should it be, or can it be, >>compensated for in development?? Personally, I am hated on several mailing lists for my comments about Digital. I will not express them here, because I do not want to tick any of you off. This is a personal opinion, but my procedures and goals have always been to produce the best quality negatives, without any thought as to how the images will be used. With programs like Photoshop and a decent scanner, you can do anything to the negatives after it is done. A great negative almost guarantees an even greater print. Now, I am not adverse to compensating during development, it is done all the time. However, everything that happens to the negative (Scanning or manipulation) will be affected by the quality of the original negative. If you have a great negative, you have won the battle. Remember, you still have options like dodgeing, burning, water bath development and many developers that can improve the quality of the negative. RM