Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for the information Roy. One thing I don't like about the higher power binoculars is they don't focus close enough for me to see my bird feeder. If I didn't like my old Zeiss 8X30's so much it would be a no-brainer for me. I'd get the new Ultra 8X30's. Sorry for wandering so far off topic but a Leica product is a Leica product:-) Bud Roy Zartarian wrote: > I recently had the opportunity to do some birding with both my own > two-year-old Swarovski 10x42 and a demo pair of the Leica Trinovid > 8x32. I found that as far as power was concerned, the 10x did not > seem to offer an advantage. At a distance where I could see a bird > clearly with the 10x, I could also see it clearly enough to identify > with the 8x. Where I could not see a bird clearly because of > distance with the 8x, the 10x did not provide an improvement. To my > eyes, the image of the Leicas was a tad brighter than that of the > Swarovskis. Also the Leica weighed less, focused faster and provided > a wider field of view. The two latter traits were especially > important to me because much of my birding is in wooded or brushy > areas where it was difficult to get on target with the higher power > glasses. > > The upshot of this rambling is to see if you can arrange to use > a pair of binoculars under "real" conditions to see how they > perform for you. Looking out a store window doesn't really tell you > much. Someone else's opinion may be helpful, but their eyes aren't > your eyes. > > And if you haven't done so already, you might look at the Better View > Desired web page (http://www.biddeford.com/~sing/BVD.html) which > contains a lot of useful and objective information about birding > optics. >