Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/10/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Joe, for what it's worth, I have a newish Team Internet at the office. This handy $2K device is an (Apache) webserver (admittedly, a slow one, even for office use), email server and DHCP server. With a single phone line, it provides 20+ people in the office with internet access, with decent performance (but we're not talking streaming audio here). A look inside revealed that it was nothing more than a '486 with 1G hard drive and Linux OS. Real magic is that these folks have made system admin a snap--it's all GUI'd, and accessed via a web browser! But...the software isn't designed to be customized, and doesn't include Majordomo, which really could stand to be GUI'd or something. I agree that the docs are atrocious, containing a great deal of information, but organized in such a way that finding the answer to fairly straightforward questions may require wading through a lot of seemingly irrelevant junk. This sort of problem is why I went with a prepackaged system like Team Internet, rather than "rolling my own": It's nice to have a life sometimes :-) Jeff - -----Original Message----- From: Joe Berenbaum <joe-b@dircon.co.uk> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Date: Tuesday, October 20, 1998 2:15 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] mejac working again >At 23:26 19/10/98 -0700, you wrote: >>The computer mejac.palo-alto.ca.us broke permanently on Sunday 18th >>October 1998. I have replaced it with a fast new computer with much >>more modern software. I will be watching carefully for a while to see >>if there are any startup problems. >>Thank you for your patience. >>Brian Reid >>owner of mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >>keeper of the Leica-users mailing list > >Brian, thanks for that! > >I don't know if anyone else asked this, but I am curious. I would be very >interested to know what spec the recently deceased machine actually was. >The idea of mejac being an elderly 486 is intriguing. > >Joe Berenbaum >