Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/09/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Just finished reading the Sept 21 international Newsweek issue. There is an advertisement section on photography and electronic imaging. Two interesting things to note: - - an advertisement for the JVC GC-S5 digital camera with megapixel quality, which is another disguise for the Fuji MX-700 (like the Leica Digilux). But.... this time you get at least an 8 MB smartmedia card instead of a 2 MB card with the Digilux (2 MB gives you only ... 2 shots at the highest quality setting!). Plus you get a floppy disk adapter so that you can download your images from your smartmedia card instead of via serial connection. And this is included in the basic package. The camera has the same design as the FX-700 (unlike the small finishing changes with the Digilux). Now I wonder how much it would cost in comparison to the Fuji MX-700 and Digilux. - - on the section "new and notable at Photokina '98", one can note the following excerpt: "Leica Digilux Digital Compact. Leica pioneered the 35mm format camera and has been associated with excellence in photography ever since. Leica's introduction of "megapixel" digital camera is a sure sign that electronic imaging is coming of age. The new Leica Digilux offers the same compact size and uncompromising quality that has made Leica cameras among the most-sought-after collector's items in all of photography. In both appearance and operation -including the optical viewfinder and operating controls such as programmed automatic exposure control and autofocus- the Digilux owes much to Leica's high-end viewfinder camera designs. But instead of 35mm film, this Leica uses a 1.5 million picture-point CCD to record high-resolution, 24 bit color images. Pictures taken with the Digilux can be viewed on the camera's built-in two-inch color monitor, displayed on a TV screen or sent to a Pc where they can be edited and printed." I wonder if the writers realized they were talking about nothing else than a Fuji camera instead... It seems all the credit for using the experience of the M rangefinder series should go to Fuji, and not to Leica. I am sure the Digilux is a fine camera, but let's be honest, it is not made -not even developed- by Leica. Just a thought. Pascal - -------------------------------------------------------- Check out: http://members.xoom.com/cyberplace/ - -------------------------------------------------------- Macintosh PowerBook G3 - it eats Pentium notebooks for lunch - -------------------------------------------------------- <<< PGP public key available on request >>>