Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/09/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Quality control problems and/or statements regarding a negative evolution of QC at Leica, come very high in the frequency of thread subjects on this list. Much more so than on any other similar list and group I have participated to up to now. Is there no way to have real statistics from the maker, the importers and/or the dealers as to the evolution of quality control related complaints from customers through the recent years? I'm sure they have a very clear picture of the situation, since they have to manage the logistics, the human resources and the whole liability paperwork related to the processing of defective goods. Is there no way for these people to go public with this, or at least to make some statement about the current situation ? The 'horror story' threads distill tons of FUD among current and prospective users. If I have no complaint whatsoever regarding my small personal experience with Leica quality, the sheer quantity of complaints and negative opinions expressed here is preventing me from advising friends to buy Leica if build quality and reliability are high on their list of priorities. These complaints and negative opinions also make me hesitate in my purchasing plans of new equipment: I cannot afford wasting thousands of dollars and have no wish at all to spend that money and then get entangled in aftersales bureaucracy. The Leica world is not limited to this list, but I'm sure that the sum of what gets published here and in other forums relating to QC problems gets echoed, directly and indirectly, to most of the prospective Leica customers. So, please, all my colleague users, do not spread an image of degraded workmanship if this is not based on real and verifiable experience. I have read posts of users fueling Leica QC condemnation for a speck of dust in a lens or for an almost invisible mark on a body, and other posts arguing that the process of degradation is evident since the first milligram of plastic entered Wetzlar. The whole discussion then gets unbalanced and might be unjustly damageable to a company whose reputation is precisely built on the quality of workmanship. An even mor urgently, please, all you Leica people who make a living out of our spending, please come forward and clarify the real situation on this strategic matter. Thanks beforehand. Friendly regards Alan Brussels-Belgium