Re: [Leica] Ricardo Nixoni's Dog RORed

["Bruce R. Slomovitz" <brslomo@erols.com>]

Great comment Marga.  I've been wondering whether or not some of these
lug-nuts have been drinking more ROR than they have used to clean lenses.

Bruce S.
- -----Original Message-----
From: MargaSouri@aol.com <MargaSouri@aol.com>
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Date: Wednesday, August 19, 1998 3:01 AM
Subject: [Leica] Ricardo Nixoni's Dog RORed


>In a message dated 8/18/98 5:52:33 , msmall@roanoke.infi.net writes:
>>
>>  I received my bottle of ROR today and, pursuant to their instructions,
>>  cleaned my glasses.  I didn't do one thing:
>
>  Marcus Smalls remarks about about ROR bring to mind the so called
> "Big Lie" with which if you speak loud enough, then people will believe
>  you to be true.
>
>  I also used ROR & it is a good lens cleaner but to advertise that it will
>  increase light transmissions by 3/4 of a f: stop and then so many of
>  LUGers saying "how true - very great" - many of you must have have
>  been using very dirty lenses before.
>
>  Maybe it wasn't Nixoni but Krushev that said that - and his wife was
>  named Leica - wasn't it.  Anyhow  - is good cleaner but so is many.
>
>  Leicolly yours,
>
>  Souris
>