Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Jim wrote:
>I submit the following:
Aaaargh! (in the plural)
>"Optimal front lens protection in unfavorable conditions (e.g. sand, salt
>water splashes!) can be achieved with colorless UVa-filters.
Yep, remember something about that in relation to my 21/4 R (multi-coated
protection filter)
>In certain
>back-light situations and in case of great contrasts however, they might
>also cause unwanted reflections, typical for any filter. The generally
>recommended lens hood protects the lens from fingerprints and raindrops as
>well."
Note the word "might". Why worry about probabilities when you can be
certain? ;-?
Actually Jim - no worries - my N*****sV underwater has no UV, but gives
great results below and above sea level.
So you're probably right and Leitz (of the first part) are wrong - a UV
filter is definitely not the key to being waterproof. It can, however,
prevent your front element from being bashed in the first place - as would
a lens cap.
I'd love to see an example of UV filter degradation in a working situation
as I've never been able to prove it myself.. Please post comparative
examples if you have them.
Slan
Alex
Alex Hurst
Waterfall
Nr. Cork
Ireland
Tel: +353 21 543 328 (H)
+352 21 270 907 (W)
Fax: +353 21 271 248
email: corkflor@iol.ie
Home website: http://homepages.iol.ie/~corkflor/
Business website: http://www.flowerlink.com/corkflorists