Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jim wrote: >I submit the following: Aaaargh! (in the plural) >"Optimal front lens protection in unfavorable conditions (e.g. sand, salt >water splashes!) can be achieved with colorless UVa-filters. Yep, remember something about that in relation to my 21/4 R (multi-coated protection filter) >In certain >back-light situations and in case of great contrasts however, they might >also cause unwanted reflections, typical for any filter. The generally >recommended lens hood protects the lens from fingerprints and raindrops as >well." Note the word "might". Why worry about probabilities when you can be certain? ;-? Actually Jim - no worries - my N*****sV underwater has no UV, but gives great results below and above sea level. So you're probably right and Leitz (of the first part) are wrong - a UV filter is definitely not the key to being waterproof. It can, however, prevent your front element from being bashed in the first place - as would a lens cap. I'd love to see an example of UV filter degradation in a working situation as I've never been able to prove it myself.. Please post comparative examples if you have them. Slan Alex Alex Hurst Waterfall Nr. Cork Ireland Tel: +353 21 543 328 (H) +352 21 270 907 (W) Fax: +353 21 271 248 email: corkflor@iol.ie Home website: http://homepages.iol.ie/~corkflor/ Business website: http://www.flowerlink.com/corkflorists