Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]jeremy kime commented about my point regarding a shape change to the M series body were an electronic vertical run shutter to be incorporated, a= nd the query regarding why. It is quite simple really. The cloth focal plane shutter runs between a large diameter compound roller under the shutter speed dial to two small drums at the other side. The vertical run electronic shutters I have seen= are controlled by a block on one side of the shutter crate and require mo= re height than a horizontal run device (isn't this what one would expect?). This would, if optimally repackaged, result in a body which was probably taller but narrower. (please note my original post said change shape not increase size). This would result in all the tooling for the body parts t= o be obsolete. Re-tooling today for a camera of M precision and M productio= n volume, in the absence of a volume model to sweeten the pill would be commercial suicide. I doubt if it could be profitably sold at 3 times the= price of the current camera which is still expensive to produce even on tooling most of which must have been amortised decades ago. I for one would be disappointed if Leica made a camera of 90's quality, like everybody else, just to add features that I do not need and which ar= e in any case available elsewhere for those that want them. I love the heft= , precision feel and handling of my M's. If I want TTL flash I have an Olympus. For AF I have an EOS, no way could Leica feel be maintained on a= n AF lens. The weighting and damping I so much like on my manual focus lens= es would be anathema to any AF system causing slow autofocus and huge batter= y consumption. As an aside I would have very much liked to buy the M6 electronic top pla= te at Christies just for interest's sake but had overspent my budget by the end of the auction! A complete non working camera, presumably a prototype= , but utiliing a top plate such as this one was sold several years ago on t= he collectors market. It must in any case be several years old because the roundel is Leitz not Leica. Obviously an idea tried out and rejected many= years ago. Frank =