Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]A couple of thoughts, Kenneth Johansson is the photographer credited with the picture in the web article, is he known to anyone on any of the lists? His experiences would certainly be interesting. Fuji's history extends back to an interchangeable lens 6x9 rangefinder camera, the G690. This had lenses from 65mm (F8 I believe) through 100, 150, to 180mm. The fastest lens was F3.5 (I think) so fast lenses aren't the order of the day in Fuji's experience. The coverage required is equivalent to 2 1/4 square format and the normal 'fast' lens there is f2.8, though some really fast lenses hit F2 I believe, so really the f4 max. is almost there, keeping the size small enough not to unbalance the camera perhaps? Either way, it leaves a convincing argument for Leicas maintaining their crown in the rangefinder hierarchy. If the price of under œ1000(UKP) with lens materialises then that's certainly hitting the price spot where it will hurt, but to take on Leica in this area (and Hasselblad have the name to do it) they would need to increase the lens repertoire yet their singular distinguishing feature of the panoramic format prevents this from being easily possible. My suspicion therefore is that this will remain a strangely unique camera, trying to be a hybrid without mastering either discipline. True seekers of 45mm (or 90mm) panoramic shots can crop them from their ordinary Hasselblad negs far cheaper than buying this new camera, those wanting a 35mm Hasselblad named rangefinder alternative to Leica will not seem content with a two lens system. Unless the lens mount is Leica M based (the only rangefinder coupled lens system) then there is no room for expansion (by the photographer), and if s/he does expand (their system), it would not provide panoramic potential. I cannot see a great future for this camera. Jem