Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]<< Other than the obvious fstop factor, I have often (from litterature) gotten the impression that the overall performance of the 90 Elamarit is superior to that of the 90 Summicron. Anyone care to elaborate if this is so ? >> Eric, I have had the 90 2.8 for several months and recently purchased the 90 2.0. The 2.8 is has better resolution and contrast. This is especially true at 2.8 and 4.0. However, the 2.0 lens results in very pretty portraits wide open. Once stopped down to 5.6, they are very close but I think the 2.8 is still sharper. Tom Shea