Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My gosh! This is the most lucid, enlightening description of these films I've ever seen. Thank you! Regards, Bud Henning J. Wulff wrote: [Snip] > This is written from Canada's West Coast, but film considerations are > generally not influenced too much by 50 degrees of longitude (latitude is > another matter). > > I've used most of Fuji's films (and Kodak's), and find that overall, I > probably prefer Kodachrome as a travel film. If you know a good place to > have it processed, that would be my recommendation. > > Kodachrome, as well as Kodak's E6 films, tends to have a longer 'toe' than > films from Fuji, especially Velvia, meaning that shadow areas are separated > better. Fuji films tend more to the 'black hole' syndrome, where anything > below a certain luminance level tends to be completely black. On the other > hand, Fuji films, (especially Velvia again) tend to have a longer > 'shoulder' than Kodachrome, meaning that highlights are differentiated > better. The overall result of these two factors is that Velvia in practice > is better rated at 40, so that you get enough shadow detail, and > overexposure is not as likely because of the long shoulder. Kodachrome 25, > on the other hand, with its long 'toe', and shorter 'shoulder', is more > easily overexposed and less likely to be underexposed, so can be rated at > 32. This means that effectively Kodachrome 25 is only 1/3 stop slower than > Velvia. Their resolution is effectively similar, and both are for most > purposes grainless, but Kodachrome has higher acutance (edge contrast > effect) which results in Ilfochrome prints _looking_ sharper when made from > Kodachrome. Color rendition is a personal choice, and somewhat influenced > by fashion. Advertising demands high decibel levels on TV and shouting > colors in ads, so Velvia with its higher saturation wins in those areas, > and I use it for that reason for most of my commercial work, but for my > personal stuff I prefer Kodachrome 25's color rendition. Some colors on > Velvia can look downright violent. > > All the above comments about Velvia apply to some degree to all of Fuji's > 100 speed films, except that Astia has especially nice skin tones. For > travel I would pick Sensia, as I do not prefer either Provia or Astia for > that purpose. My local pro lab sells all Fuji films with processing for a > very good price, so I get film stored and aged to perfection with top notch > processing for $12Cdn. > > * Henning J. Wulff > /|\ Wulff Photography & Design > /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com > |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com