Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/07/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Sun, 5 Jul 1998, Andre Jean Quintal wrote: >Allo LUGERS, > You always talk about Summicron and Summilux 50mm. > But, that 60mm macro R lens keeps crying for attention. > Would you care to compare it's performance differences? > Is it real good just up close? Or is it a far more than > decent lens for general purpose use ? > To me, 60mm is just about right for the sort of portraits > i like. 75mm - 90mm would be a "long" lens, by my > private tastes. Obviously, like everyone, that 100mm APO > strikes a chord... [But, with my old Nikon FTn and FM2, > with that "baby zoom" i don't really like, i often wind > up composing at about 60mm - 70mm focal, and about 35mm, also, > most of the time..., out of personal aesthetics.] > So, since many here have such long standing Leica experience > [and privilege...], I'd sure like to "soak up" some 60mm > macro-R anecdotes... Is the macro extender worth considering ? > Thank you very much, > Andre Jean Quintal Andre, I've been using the 60 macro for nearly 20 years and I'm completely delighted with it at all distances. It's not just the sharpness, contras= t, and color quality but also the 3-dimensional "feel" of the chromes that I've learned to expect from Leica optics. I've used the N***** 55mm f/3.= 5 Micro and I presently have (and use on occasion) the N***** 55mm f/2.8 Micro and of the three the 60 is easily my favorite. You don't read much= discussion of this lens on LUG because there's no debate, it's a super lens! Doug Herr