Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Charles Dunlap wrote: SNIP > Leica needs to target the magazines in the US and abroad which have readers > likely to want and be able to afford their cameras. They have a very > conservative approach to advertising and do a poor job of explaining > exactly what sets Leica cameras apart. One of the best ads. that I've ever > seen for a camera was the Contax G1 ad. that ran in several of the highest > circulation photo magazines. It very clearly explained what made the camera > different and worth buying. Leica ads. essentially assume that you already > know what Leica is. > > If Leica does embark on an improved ad. campaign they need to hire the > right agency. They need a US agency for their ads. in this country. The > text in their promotional brochures is written in a strange German English > with funny quotation marks. > > -Charlie Charlie, Good point. One magazine I can think of is Cigar Afficionado. Not because cigar smokers are necessarily photographers but because the ads in that magazine are targeted for people with more discretionary income than you can shake a stick at. I mean we're talking $10,000 Blancpain or Piguet watches, outrageously expensive autos, articles on learjets and gulfstreams. All that stuff. Obviously, it is targeted towards people who must have the best regardless of their ability to use it. So, why not have them subsidize real users. And, hopefully, Leica will not waste their time with things like Eine Stucke or Danish Wedding collectibles but, rather, straight off the line stuff that increased sales will help amortize the R&D and tooling so that they'll be around for the rest of us. - -- Carl Socolow Sometimes the wrong thing is exactly the thing you should do.