Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I suspect it is totally consumer demand. The Elmar does have the advantage of being much smaller and lighter. I think the Summitar is currently a real bargain. Perhaps there is less interest in the Summitar because it was replaced by the slightly better Summicron whereas the Elmar is the "last of the line" for that design lens. (Except for the 2.8 version which is not better, just faster) Cheers! kw >Is there some reason why the 50 Elmar f3.5 is more pricey than the 50 >Summitar f2 when the Summitar is a very nice lens capable of fine >performance even at large apertures? > >Dan K. - ---- Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits LHSA, MEA, LAW preferred---> <wilcox@umcc.umich.edu> <kwilcox@gfn.org>