Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I just got back from a trip to Keeble and Shuchat in Palo Alto. I had the pleasure to meet fellow LUGger Jeff Alford (hello, Jeff) who works there and to handle a bunch of new Leica gear. While it's fresh on my mind I thought I'd pass along some impressions for those of you who, like me, do not live conveniently close to a well-stocked Leica dealer. The Goodies: 1) The new M6 HM: I want one. I don't wear glasses and I don't use the 28mm lens. I do use a 90. The difference in the 90 framelines is, in practice, profound. The difference in the 50 didn't strike me as strongly (although it is there, of course). The 35mm lines are almost as far out as the 28mm lines on the normal M6, but I didn't have to strain to see them--I was worried that my eyelashes would be brushing the viewfinder window or that I couldn't rest my cheek on my thumb when viewing, but neither was the case. The 35mm lines are a bit harder to take in, but the tradeoff is well worth it for me, even though I normally use the 35mm lens over 60% of the time. One thing that isn't improved in the new finder is the occasional flaring out that can occur when focussing on dark scenes with an adjacent bright light source. The larger focussing patch, however, meant that some portions of the patch were not flared, a potential small advantage. 2) The new 35/2 ASPH: Two physical improvements over the last version struck me. First, the slip-on lens cover clips on to the front of the lens shade, so that the shade can remain on when the lens is stored securely. This can be added to the older version of the lens, and it's a nice feature, well implemented. Secondly, the extra 100g weight of the new lens balances beautifully on the M6. I felt that I could hold the camera more steadily than with the lighter, non-ASPH Summicron. This is important for me since I like to shoot wide open at low shutter speeds. It's a benefit of the new lens design that I hadn't considered. The concave front and rear elements look cool, too. The focussing tab is wider than on the previous version (can't see it matters either way), and the aperture ring is a bit wider on the ASPH--an improvement in my estimation. Jeff said the Bokeh on the new ASPH is comparable to that of the old one and not harsh as the 35 Summilux-M ASPH can produce. I haven't had a chance to see this for myself. 3) The Minilux Zoom: Well, if you've seen my recent post you know I don't much like it. On inspection I saw two more problems. First, the manual focus has about ten click stop distances. Manual focussing, therefore, only lets you set the focus to one of a handful of zones; it does not provide continuous electronically assisted focussing. This might not matter given the small max. aperture of the zoom lens, but I was still disappointed. Second, the viewfinder provides no information. In fact there's nowhere on the camera that displays the shutter speed or aperture in use. The viewfinder is small but reasonably clear and sharp. It's very reminiscent of any number of other point and shoot viewfinders; it's better but not enormously better. I'd still like to see photos from this camera, but the drawbacks to the body are numerous (compared to the Contax Tvs). 4) The Leica 21mm Viewfinder: I definitely want one. It's very bright, very sharp, and places the full 21mm field within easy view without great curvature. The Contax viewfinder for the G lens pales by comparison. The G finder is not as bright (it's fine, it just doesn't reach the same level) or as crisp. The G finder does not have as much eye relief, is bigger than the Leica finder, and has a much more curved and distorted view. If you're going to use a 21mm lens with any seriousness or frequency then do yourself a favor and get the Leica finder. 5) The Abrahamson Rapid Winder: Someday I'd like one. The 21mm finder is at the top of my new wish list, followed by the M6HM and 35/2 ASPH, but this gadget is nice. The black is shinier than the M6 top plate, but is quite attractive. The device is very well made and operates smoothly. It is very intuitive and simple to use. As soon as I picked it up I had two fingers naturally wrapped around the lever and was sliding it along the bottom to advance the film without a second thought. Even when not neccessary the extra 1.5 cm (estimated) in height that the winder adds to the camera gave me a better grip than normal. If I were considering one of the Leica hand grips I might consider the winder instead since it provides much of the extra handheld stability. The winder also centers the tripod thread which could help balance the camera when using a ball head. 6) The Abrahamson Soft Release: It's wider than the old Fred Ward version and a bit shorter. I like it. I'm going to get one in black when they are available. 7) Billingham Simplies lens pouches: These are really nice. The are nylon with a padded bottom. They are big enough to hold a 90 Elmarit-M, but small and compactable (a word?) enough to hold smaller lenses. I have some generic black pouches that shed black fibers and are a bit thicker than neccessary for my well padded camera bag. I'm going to get a set of the Simplies pretty soon. At $24 per pouch, however, it's not on the top of the list. I'll use the others for a while yet. 8) Giotto's Ball Pod Mini: A shirt pocket, plastic ball head, table tripod with very sturdy telescoping, rubber tipped aluminum legs. I bought one. This little guy is just what I've been wanting in a table tripod. I'd love it more if the ball head were machined aluminum, anodized black, but it is small enough that I will take it with me and sturdy enough that I will get sharper photos. 4 inches long collapsed, 2 3/4 inch legs telescope smoothly like a thick car antenna to almost 7 inches. That's about it. Happy shooting (really more fun than shopping any day). - -Charlie - -------------------------------------------- Charles E. Dunlap Earth Sciences Department University of California Santa Cruz, CA 95064 Tel.: (408) 459-5228 Fax.: (408) 459-3074 mailto:cdunlap@es.ucsc.edu - --------------------------------------------