Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> a) is the >ASPH worth the extra cost when I'd seldom use the lens wide open? Perhaps not. I have used my 35/2 wide open on numerous occasions, taking some of my favorite photos this way. > b) how much >would I want to use my 39 mm swing-out polarizer with this lens? I'm not sure why this is an issue. Both ASPH and non-ASPH lenses have 39mm filter threads. >d) is a late Canadian Summicron likely >to be more reliable than a lens from Solms? The Solms reliability debate has always seemed suspicious to me. I've had lenses from both and no problems with any of them. Mechanically the Canadian 35 Summicron seemed a little more shakey than the two Solms lenses, but this was probably due to age. >Erwin Puts mentioned that the ASPH lenses may be somewhat warmer than the >non-ASPH lenses. This is important to me since I'm extremely concerned about >the color rendition of a lens and I want all of my later lenses to be equal in >this respect. I can't understand why the new lens would be slightly warmer. I've discounted this statement because Erwin Puts reviewed an early example (pre-release) of the lens. Leica can control the warmth of the lens via the lens coatings and has a stated policy of maintaining color balance across the range of modern lenses. I would be more concerned about differences in color balance among older lenses than in the modern designs. With that said I've never noticed and problems with color balance in any case. If you like, I will take photos (pick a slide film) with the new ASPH 35/2, latest model 50 Summicron, and latest 90/2.8 Elmarit (same scene, same aperture) and send them to you. The only problem is that Leica will not tell Don Chatterton when they expect my new lens to arrive! I can understand production delays, but Leica is also being evasive about when my new M6 0.85 will appear. No one there seems to know when to expect deliveries from Solms, nor do they seem to care about customer frustration. When I call (no more than once in a week) they act inconvenienced by my requests for information. Well, this isn't relevant to you. Best wishes, Charlie - -------------------------------------------- Charles E. Dunlap Earth Sciences Department University of California Santa Cruz, CA 95064 Tel.: (408) 459-5228 Fax.: (408) 459-3074 mailto:cdunlap@es.ucsc.edu - --------------------------------------------