Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - --------------58DB5D62922818D7EC5EEF64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Might interest some of you... - --------------58DB5D62922818D7EC5EEF64 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <owner-nppa-l@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU> Received: from CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU ([141.209.1.16]) by netexpress.bonzai.net (Netscape Mail Server v2.0) with SMTP id AAA165 for <fbrunell@BONZAI.NET>; Tue, 16 Jun 1998 15:22:23 -0100 Received: from CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU by CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R4) with BSMTP id 0516; Tue, 16 Jun 98 15:17:35 EDT Received: from CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@CMUVM) by CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (LMail V1.2c/1.8c) with BSMTP id 5064; Tue, 16 Jun 1998 15:17:24 -0400 Received: from CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU by CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8c) with spool id 1727 for NPPA-L@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU; Tue, 16 Jun 1998 15:17:16 -0400 Received: from CMUVM (NJE origin SMTP@CMUVM) by CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (LMail V1.2c/1.8c) with BSMTP id 5052; Tue, 16 Jun 1998 15:17:13 -0400 Received: from hil-img-10.compuserve.com (149.174.177.140) by CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R4) with TCP; Tue, 16 Jun 98 15:17:12 EDT Received: (from root@localhost) by hil-img-10.compuserve.com (8.8.6/8.8.6/2.12) id PAA02564; Tue, 16 Jun 1998 15:17:42 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <199806161516_MC2-4069-CB3B@compuserve.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 15:16:30 -0400 Reply-To: Joe Traver <TRAVER@COMPUSERVE.COM> Sender: NPPA Discussion List <NPPA-L@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU> From: Joe Traver <TRAVER@COMPUSERVE.COM> Subject: internet copyright lawsuit To: NPPA-L@CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU Dear Friends, Please feel free to pass this message along to any interested = photographers, photo editors and others. I brought this lawsuit in order to try to show that there is still = copyright protection in the digital age. I'd like to alert as many = people as possible of this example. =2E..Bill Swersey =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D (C) 1998, Editor & Publisher. Friday, June 12, 1998 $3,500 TO FREELANCE PHOTOG For Image Taken From Web Site by David Noack The Boston Herald has paid $3,500 in an out-of-court settlement for = grabbing a freelance photographer's work off the Discovery Online Web = site and publishing it in the newspaper without the photographer's = permission. The agreement with the Herald, which was reached in late March, was = sparked by a copyright infringement lawsuit filed in December 1997 in = U.S. District Court in Boston by Bill Swersey, a New York-based = photographer. He claimed the newspaper used the photograph he took for = Discovery Online without his permission. The legal arguments centered on whether the Herald had committed = copyright infringement or was using the picture according to "fair use" = standards. While the Herald settled the case, it did not admit to any = wrongdoing or liability. A Web Turnabout In the area of online copyright and fair use legal controversies, it's = usually newspapers that go after Web site developers for posting pictures= = and text taken, linked or framed from the virtual publication. But in = this case, the print newspaper was the culprit. Swersey is a freelancer who has shot for the New York Times, Time, = Newsweek and other print publications. The subject of the photograph was Dave Kerpen, an entertaining concession= = worker who was selling soft drinks last year at Boston Red Sox games at = Fenway Park. Swersey was on assignment for Discovery Online = (http://www.discovery.com), the Web version of the Discovery cable = channel. Last July, he was retained to shoot "slice of life" pictures = from around New England for an online "Picture of the Day" feature. He = was paid less than $2,000 by Discovery Online for the work. Photo Appears in Herald Weeks Later The picture of the vendor balancing soft drinks on his head was published= = on the Discovery site on July 18. The photograph was licensed for = publication with Swersey's permission. The Discovery Online Web site = includes a copyright disclaimer link at the bottom of the page. A few = weeks later, on Aug. 6, the same photograph appeared in the Herald, = accompanied by some other photos and a story about Kerpen being fired = from his job. "I decided to pursue it in large part to make an example," said Swersey. = "Because I thought it was a very important time to make a case like this.= " He first contacted the Herald to find out why the picture was used, but = said he was given the runaround. Would Have Wanted $150 Swersey, who also registered the photograph with the U.S. Copyright = Office, said if the newspaper had called after the photo first appeared = online and asked to use it, he would have charged only $150. "Once it was used without my permission, I was going to take a lot more = than $150, but maybe we would have settled for $500 to $1,000. I think = they should get a slap on the wrist so they don't do that to anyone = else," said Swersey, who is now in Russia organizing the InterFoto = Photojournalism Festival, an annual event. Robert Dushman, the newspaper's attorney, said they decided to settle the= = case, since going through a court trial would have been more costly in = the long run. "Although I thought we had a reasonably defensible claim it was going to = cost us more to defend it than he was willing to settle for. I actually = looked at this as a kind of a nuisance settlement," said Dushman, who = noted that part of the deal also included the rights to use the = photograph in the future. While the settlement does not establish any legal precedent, Dushman said= = that maybe the newspaper should have pursued the case in court in light = of all the publicity the issue has received. Andrew D. Epstein, Swersey's attorney, said the Herald's "fair use" = argument in using the photo was unfounded. "It wasn't fair use. They closely cropped the photograph. They could have= = had somebody looking at the computer screen and there was the picture. = They could have taken a picture of this vendor looking at the computer = screen with his picture (at the ballpark) up on the screen. That might = have been fair use. That would have been newsworthy. A picture of the kid= = looking at himself on the monitor," said Epstein. He said the Herald cropped the photograph out of the Web page, making it = appear like it was their picture. "If the Herald has used the photograph with all of the surrounding = Website information that is shown on the computer monitor, then the use = may have been fair use. My contention is that the Herald overstepped the = bounds of fair use and infringed Bill Swersey's copyright," said Epstein.= ~ ~ ~ David Noack is associated editor of MediaINFO.com. (C) 1998, Editor & Publisher. - --------------58DB5D62922818D7EC5EEF64--