Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for the review, Dick. Curious that the Kodak should've given you more curvature when using the same lens, so I have to wonder if some of this is a byproduct of the various condensors and heat absorbers in the system? These things get so complicated sometimes, yet my goal is simple: To bring "The Imax Experience" home with me in a compact, lightweight package, so I can take it with me, too. Love the Hasselblad PCP80 and Pradovit 2002, but the words "Boat anchor" come to mind :-) Now to find the same basic performance in a lighter-duty setup for smaller rooms. Jeff - -----Original Message----- From: Richard W. Hemingway <n5xrd@telepath.com> >After giving the RT-300 to my daughter with Kodak projection lenses (you >can see the kind of father I am!) I used the colorplan and sleeve with the >Ektagraph. It worked quite well. The interesting thing was that the Kodak >projector showed more curvature in the projected slides than either the RT >or 2002 with the same lens!!! That was the main reason for getting the RT >back, as well as being able to use a stack loader. However, I like the >2002 so much I don't use the stack loader - just put the news slides in a >tray. >