Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have been drafted into doing my daughter's soccer team portraits (the commercial photographer that was hired did a less than adequate job (no, he did not use a Leica!)). Each girl will have an individual portrait and then the obligatory group picture. These will be done just prior to their end-of-season party at our pool. I'm thinking, since my yard has some nice areas with a variety of shade, that my M-3 with my 90mm Elmarit on a tripod and perhaps my Vivitar 285 set on 1/16 power would be a reasonable set-up for the individual potraits. While a lot of folks would say use a 90mm Summicron to have more variety in DOF, I've got to dance with what brung me. I think the soft lighting of open shade would be quite pleasing and the electronic flash could provide a mild 'catch-light' in their eyes and open up any shadows just a little bit. I usually use the flash with a bounce diffuser to avoid the "deer in the headlights" look. Just to be on the safe side I will have my Canon EOS with a 28-105 zoom available as a backup and for the group picture. Questions: Any film recommendations? Since I do expect these to be enlarged, fine grain would be nice. Color print film would be preferred since I can get the portrait proofs back during the party, but to use any sort of fill flash with an M3, it'll have to be pretty slow. If I can't use electronic flash, I'll try to use some sort of reflector and bounce some light into the faces. I will have the opportunity to shoot a test roll using my daughter as the model and refine exposure, fill ratios, etc.before having to do it "for real." Any thoughts on the setup in general? I don't usually do portrait work at all, but I've been "drafted" to make the best of a truly fubared situation (would you take portraits of 10 year old girls in bright noonday sun? They look like old women squinting and the harsh light does nothing to capture the paradox of both the softness of them as little girls and their toughness as competitors). I think the photog's goals was to get it done as quickly as possible Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated!