Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/06/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]YowZa. I really started a tangent this time. In the interest of those who are wondering what Rouge River was... (all from memory, better histories easily at hand...) From sometime after the 1st World War on, the Rouge River plant was the largest, most integrated auto plant in the world. They processed iron ore into iron (and I think steel), pretty raw timber into wooden parts, and so on. It was important for being a huge integrated facility that could make cars very cheaply. It was the exact opposite of the outsourcing and specialization used today. It was also, by all accounts I've seen, an inhumane place to work. Not only were employees turned into machines in a rather fast paced assembly line, but a private security force enforced lots of rude rules. (Men wrote of being fired because they were caught sleeping in the bathrooms while *on their break*) And, when a group of men later went to one of the gates to simply *ask* for support in a time of unemployment, the guards shot at them. Bloody labor disputes followed. The violence was NOT the beginning of trouble or harshness at Rouge River, but it certainly attracted lots of attention. The relevence to the Leica glass discussion was simply that "totally vertically integrated" versus "outsourced and specialized" doesn't make much difference to the end user, it's delivered quality that counts. It was a sort of counter example made in passing. I still claim that whether Leica made their own glass or bought it from some speciality maker isn't very important. They might have gotten as good or better results with glass from outside suppliers. bmw