Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'll second that, though mine's a stock unit: Very straightforward operation, and if you get results which are significantly off from what you had planned, it really *is* your fault :-) Probably should tape the ISO setting into place, as it's too easy to move inadvertently. Pentax does not appear to have made changes in this thing for an eternity, and they possibly risk tar and feathering if they change the basic nature of it! And it uses the same 6V battery as my Hasselblad (but I splurged and bought a second one anyway) In case anyone's purchased one of those "other" meters, and is filled with regret, I am in the market for an inexpensive analog unit or digital unit offering 1/10th stop accuracy. This is for my densitometer project. If anyone's got a spare gathering dust, please email me at segawa@netone.com. Jeff - -----Original Message----- From: Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> >I use the old (but still current) Pentax Spot meter, corrected by Zone VI >for color use. I like this meter because it's basically analog, even though >it shows numbers and dots. I also like that the reading is read through the >viewfinder while metering. It's easy to scan the scene, metering on >highlight, shadow, midtone, all without ever removing the meter from your >eye. Over the years I have looked at all other spot meters on the market, >and would not ever trade my Pentax meter for any of them. > >Jim >