Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: M6HM vs M6J , the complete (?) story !
From: Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 12:47:11 -0400

At 11:57 AM 21-05-98 -0300, you wrote:
>Dammit!  That just makes me angry all over again that the M6J was produced
(and 
>thus priced) as a collectible rather than a user.  Sure, the HM gives us the 
>higher magnification.  But the M6J looks the way an M should, while
happening 
>to have a meter.  I wanted one when it came out, I still want one, and I 
>couldn't and can't justify the inflated price.  Dammit.
>
>
> -Jeff Moore <jbm@instinet.com>
>

The HM is a great photo making tool, a great camera.  Who cares if another
model 'looks the way an M should'?  On what stone is it written how an M
camera should look?

Dan C.