Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/05/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, I have seen that one - and from it I got the idea that this lens i= s not vrey highly regarded - but my experiences are similar to Gilcreast=B4= s. - ---------- > From: Lucien <lucien@ubi.edu> > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] M-35/1,4 esteem among Leica-philes, was: 2/35 SummicronSummicron > Date: 17. toukokuuta 1998 21:08 >=20 > Raimo Korhonen wrote: > >My 35 mm Summilux is from 1976 -=20 > >I have had it from 1985 and quite satisfied with it.=20 > >It is not held in very high esteem among Leica-philes. >=20 > I don't think so. >=20 > Have a look at: >=20 > <http://www.pond.com/~lhsa/articles/summilux.html> >=20 >=20 > Lucien