Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Martin V. Howard wrote: >>The problem with "nosus humungus" is not that the nose is big, but rather that it is *disproportionally* large (in relationship to the rest of the face). Consequently, a nose ought to be more disproportionally large with a 35mm from 19 inches away, than with a 50mm near-focus from 19 inches away. Right?<< Sounds reasonable to me (but I'm no optical expert)! But on a related topic, I recently read (in a Leica catalog, I think) that a 50mm lens most closely approximates the "angle of view" of the human eye (which I guess refers to the 50mm lens's 45 degree angle of view); yet I also recall reading years ago that what human eyes see as the relationship among objects, near to far, is approximated by an 85mm lens. Can any LUG member who HAS some optical expertise confirm that latter notion? Art Peterson