Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I hope this doesn't start a flame war, but the recent discussion of Modulation Transfer Function, aside from the concommitant copyright discussion has me a bit confused. In Neblette's book on photography, he holds that the MTF is a 'system' measurement and includes not just the camera and lens, but the film, and processing, at the very least. This would mean that for each film/developer combination, there would be a different MTF chart, even with the same lens and camera combination. I got the impression that the MTF was of limited use for judging a camera/lens. It rather gave a generalized idea of the performance, that taken with other data, the MTF is merely a component of a method for evaluating optical systems. I could see that if the tester standardized his film and development, say with Hurter and Driffield's formulas for sensitometric evaluation, and tested many camera and lens combinations, that you could make judgements for that 'population' of cameras, at that particular time, and for under that particular film andeveloper combination. If one goes on to make prints, then MTF data should include testing the camera/lens combinations with the particular enlarger lens/paper/development data... I can understand the concept of multivariant analysis, but it seems that pretty soon, you end up picking the fly spots out of the pepper, and really not getting anywhere. I can tell you that when I started to use a Leica, I had to hustle to get a lens on my enlarger that could do justice to the negatives. I use Vivitar VHE lenses- they were the best I could get, and I am sure that if I got a Leitz lens, I could even see more improvement! Do they now use lasers for MTF? What is the process today? Is it able to be standardized so that a lab on one continent can reproduce the results of a lab elsewhere? TIA, Dan'l dwpost@msn.com