Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]- --simple boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: "cc:Mail Note Part" At 10:52 AM 4/23/98 -0500, you wrote: > > I took the following from the Kodachrome list. It appears Kodachrome isn't > as good as it used to be. I guess nothing is sacred anymore:-(. Yeah, and running has gotten harder. I think they make miles longer than they used to. Maybe it's because Kodachrome just doesn't look as good as it did because it's competition has been improving? And has anyone on the Kodachrome list heard anything about a new Kodachrome coming out? Or has Kodak really given up on competing with Fuji? ========== Eric Welch St. Joseph, MO http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch Is reading in the bathroom considered Multi-Tasking? - --simple boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; name="RFC822.TXT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="RFC822.TXT" Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us by mail.sd91.bc.ca (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.10.00) ; Thu, 23 Apr 98 18:22:21 -0800 Return-Path: <owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Received: from by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (5.65/KJV) id AA07353 Thu, 23 Apr 98 17:48:07 -0700 Received: from sleepy.ponyexpress.net by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (5.65/KJV) id AA07344 Thu, 23 Apr 98 17:47:54 -0700 Received: from leicaland (PonyExpress-5300-4-port-45.ponyexpress.net [207.150.95.173]) by ponyexpress.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA10881 for <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 19:40:17 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199804240040.TAA10881@ponyexpress.net> X-Sender: ewelch@mailhost.ponyexpress.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1.327 (Beta) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 19:22:07 -0500 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us From: Eric Welch <ewelch@ponyexpress.net> Subject: Re: [Leica] Kodachrome Info In-Reply-To: <000201bd6ee6$9a3463a0$da206420@kimmel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Precedence: bulk Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us - --simple boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; name="RFC822.TXT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="RFC822.TXT" Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us by mail.sd91.bc.ca (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.10.00) ; Thu, 23 Apr 98 19:04:11 -0800 Return-Path: <owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Received: from by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (5.65/KJV) id AA07863 Thu, 23 Apr 98 18:27:24 -0700 Received: from [204.244.104.125] by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (5.65/KJV) id AA07857 Thu, 23 Apr 98 18:27:14 -0700 Received: from mail.sd91.bc.ca by sd91.bc.ca (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id SAA14626; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 18:16:46 -0700 Received: from ccMail by mail.sd91.bc.ca (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.10.00) id AA893381074; Thu, 23 Apr 98 18:24:34 -0800 Message-Id: <9804238933.AA893381074@mail.sd91.bc.ca> X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R8.10.00 Date: Thu, 23 Apr 98 17:57:12 -0800 From: "Administrator"<administrator_at_elec__bus@mail.sd91.bc.ca> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Cc: <Administrator@mail.sd91.bc.ca> Subject: [Leica] Message not deliverable Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="simple boundary" Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Precedence: bulk Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us - --simple boundary--