Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 09:23 AM 4/13/98 -0700, you wrote: >You guys see ONE lousy photograph from this woman and >immediately jump to the conclusion that she is the "worst" >photographer you have ever learned about and that her "stuff >is disgusting?" A bit out of line, don't you think? > No. If it's printed in a national magazine with kudos about her being a new discovery, I have to assume that the printed photograph is one of her best. You certainly wouldn't print one of her worst for an announcement. So as one of the best, I do not wish to see the rest. That one is disgusting enough. And as represented in this announcement, she is indeed the worst photographer I have ever learned about. This is my honest opinion. What was printed in the magazine was neither art, nor photography. What she is perpetrating on the artsy fartsy crowd is fraud as far as I'm concerned. But to each his own. If someone wants to pay big bucks for unrecognizable, blurry, images of who knows what, more fool them. Before long, pictures of excrement will be commanding huge sums. Actually, from the looks of that image on page 19, it already is. Jim