Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Another bandwidth-conserving multi-purpose posting for your computing enjoyment follows :-) Thank you to the person who mentioned the shortcomings of incident metering: I had a very fine digital incident meter, but for the life of me, was never able to consistently get the desired results, unless the subject was under controlled lighting, else close at hand, and therefore, absolutely, positively under the same lighting conditions! For landscapes in which the mountain range was brightly sunlit, and I was in shade, forget it! Various attempts at simulating the correct lighting, such as holding the meter in a brightly-lit area nearby, was just too iffy. For now, the main appeal of incident-type meters to me is that some are very small and need not be held up to one's eye for metering, which is good when working around people. I do not mind a little art critiquing, and have sometimes wondered why we've done so little on the LUG! After all, Leica is not a purchase to be taken lightly, and it does suggest an above-average passion for the medium. I have visited Eric Welch's site, and find the photos pleasant. I do not feel more ("Apple Pie" is probably the strongest, and has probably put many a LUGer off that particular dish for awhile :-) ), but wonder if such was the intent? Rather, it seems to me that he's chosen photos to accompany and illustrate text, but not to completely overwhelm it, the way Eisenstadt's image of Goebbels surely would--what text could you add to a photo like THAT which wouldn't seem superfluous? I probably responded least of all to the stained glass images, yet they were well-crafted. Why? Because while these might be part of an effective series of images, alone, they do not tell me how it feels to be standing in that space, amidst those illuminated panes; I have a number of such photos myself, but the ones which I enjoy most are those which give some sense of the qualties of light, as it streams down (from the heavens, as it were!), to the realm of human beings. Here are a couple of photos by well-known nature photographers which I feel really stand out from their other works, as shown on the websites: Season Passing by Thomas D. Mangelsen http://www.mangelsen.com/print6027.htm His wildlife images seem to be most popular, yet Season Passing has none, but it's stunning all the same: He's captured a very fleeting moment, and the play of light and shadow on the landscape gives the viewer a sense of waning summer warmth, and impending cold. Polar Bear Cub Resting Against It's Mother by Galen Rowell http://www.mountainlight.com/gallery/wildlife/aa804pic.html This appears to be a real departure for Rowell, as it's not a grand scene, done in brilliant colors, rather, it's an intimate scene, rendered nearly 2-dimensional and monochromatic! Freeman Patterson has, unfortunately, chosen to put few images on his site, but he's published an artist's statement which is well worth a read: http://www.houssennet.nb.ca/pub/DEC/artstate.htm What can you say about a man who can create magic from such simple subject matter as sunlight shining on his dining table?