Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Alf, Tom, 'Second that, and it was something which crossed my mind yesterday at the HCB exhibition I visited. The pictures were gripping but the sharpness wasn't what made them so. OK, we're privileged to use the sharpest lenses in 35mm technique but the end result is whether the picture succeeds, either to ourselves or others. The picture can succeed irrespective of the technical perfection of the lens. The concept of a subjective review of lenses, rather akin to the subjective reviews of hi-fi gear, is intriguing, to me at any rate. Jem ---------- From: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' Sent: 06 April 1998 08:22 To: KIMEJ44; 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' Subject: Re: [Leica] 24 Elmarit f2.8 ASPH << I'm just asking myself: If the physical parameters support one side, and the emotional view supports another side - isn't the test missing something essential which is vivid to human perception ? >> Alf, this is a great point - a consideration that one sometimes forgets. I must confess that I am generally oriented toward the numbers. It is good to be reminded that the emotional view is important. In fact, I would say that the emotional side is more important in the event that it conflicts with the more scientific side of things. What really counts is satisfaction with the photographs and the process. It is certainly true that a certain personality of a lens may contribute to the feel that one is looking for. Tom Shea