Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/04/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have a brassy black one from 1949. I use it on my M bodies as well and my III bodies. I paid $35 about 2 years ago. The glass is in perfect condition. This is one of the lenses I used to do my niece's "senior" pictures with last fall. All the ones she chose were taken with it. It's performance is not even close to my 90 Tele-Elmarit lens which I consider to be a very fine lens. kw >Luggers, > >I am thinking of getting a 90/4 Elmar screwmount as a budget tele. Are >there pros and cons like black vs. chrome or some years better than others >with this lens? I seem to remember posts about people still using these >older lenses w/ adapters but don't recall the specifics. I just can't >spend 500.00+ for a lens that I will use very infrequently. I never really >liked my skinny (mid 80's) 90/2.8 Tele-Elmarit I had years ago but if I can >get close to its performance for around 250.00 I might go for that. BTW, >are hoods still available for these lenses? If you have/use one of these >screwmount 90/4 Elmars, please let me know how you like it. > > >Thanks > >Mark - ---- Ken Wilcox Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits LHSA, MEA, LAW preferred---> <wilcox@umcc.umich.edu> <kwilcox@gfn.org>