Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Of course, one does not HAVE to use a viewfinder when using the 21mm, right? At 01:33 AM 3/31/98 -0500, TTAbrahams wrote: >Alan, The cost of doing the conversion is approx. US$600 with the customer >supplying the lens. I don't do the conversion myself, it requires collimators >and more optical know-how than I have. The original concept came about when I >lost the umpteens finder for my 21/3,4 and I sat down and tried to figure out >a better solution. A good friend of mine is the former head of Leica Canada's >Service department , Reinhold Mueller in Toronto, and I managed to convince >him to do the first one for me, this has since been followed by another 21/3,4 >conversion, a 21/2,8 and last year a 21/2,8 Asph. It is rather obvious that I >like it! > You can reach Reinhold by phone, Canada (416)467-6992 or by fax (416) >467-7447. > The price is high, almost 2 finders, but the benefits far outweigh the cost. >The parallax problem is solved, you dont have to move your eye from focus to >frame and it really looks neat too! You get a slight light loss in the finder, >you add more glass and a slight loss is inevitable but not enough to worry >about. On the M3 and M6HM you only get 35 and 28 viewing angles, but on >M2/M4/M4-2/M4-P/M6 you get pretty close to the 21 (M6/M4P tends to cut it to >22 mm angle due to an antireflection mask in the finder). My personal >favourite is a M2 with the frame illumination window covered, this way you >have no framelines, only the rangefinder patch and "What you see is what you >get". >Tom A > Francesco Sanfilippo, Five Senses Productions webmaster@5senses.com http://www.5senses.com/