Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 30 Mar 1998 17:51:17 -0800, Francesco Sanfilippo <fls@5senses.com> wrote: > Anyone have experience with this brand NEW color neg film? What new? I suspect that `Superia' is a noise word which may be discarded without affecting the parse. From Fuji's web-page at http://www.fujifilm.com/home/faqsfact/amfilmfq.htm: * What is the Difference Between Superia & Super HQ 35mm Films? * Fujicolor Superia is Fujifilm's Current Premium Film, Whereas The Super HQ is Manufactured on a Larger Basis For Chain Stores and Sold At A Lower Cost. Although Super HQ is a Lower Grade Film, Both Films Are Of Fujifilm's High Standard Quality and Are Backed By Fuji Photo Film. Nice capitalization, eh? (My translation: every last one of the nominally-`amateur' Fuji films one might actually consider using will be labelled `Superia' once the distribution channels have flushed awhile.) ...but note just how useful this silly Fuji webpage is: the same FAQ answers such burning questions as: * If I Buy Fujicolor 35mm Film, Do I Have To Use It In a Fuji 35mm Camera? > How does it compare to Kodak Royal Gold 100 and previous > Fuji Reala 100? Try it. See what you think yourself. I expect is *is* the previous Reala, after some label reengineering. The Reala I've gotten from B&H has said `Superia' on the box for the better part of a year. I've been ignoring it -- assumed it was just some non-US-market nonsense I didn't need to care about.