Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Is the 2.0 as sharp and contrasty at 2.8 as the 2.8 at 2.8? At 09:19 PM 3/25/98 -0600, Eric Welch wrote: >At 08:12 AM 3/25/98 -0800, you wrote: >> >> Would you agree that the 2.8 is sharper at 2.8 than the 2.0 at 2.8? >> Is there better microcontrast and resolution? > > >The latest version of the 90 Elmarit is definitely better in all respects >(except at f/2). I own and use the 90 Summicron, and love it, and would never >get an Elmarit. I shoot a lot at f/2. It's tack sharp wide open. Either way >you >can't go wrong. But for absolute best image quality, I believe the Elmarit is >the better lens. (The latest version that is identical in the M and R systems >optically). >========== > >Eric Welch >St. Joseph, MO >http://www.ponyexpress.net/~ewelch > >How do I set my laser printer on stun? > Francesco Sanfilippo, Five Senses Productions webmaster@5senses.com http://www.5senses.com/