Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 1998/03/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I find it amazing that so much passion could be aroused over such relatively unimportant issues. Once a statement of fact is presented, why not let it be instead of trying to prevail with point-counter point. If an individual chooses to use a filter because he/she believes that it serves a certain function, than, let that individual believe what he/she wants. You can lead a horse to water……. I do not use filters for "protection" because I happen to believe that any additional optical device can only reduce the performance of the lens. Using a filter is a compromise, a gambit, we give up a small degree of performance in order to achieve some desired effect. However, I have seen lenses saved from a nasty dent by the impact absorption properties of a cheap filter, and I am very pleased when I buy a used lens which was protected by a filter for the glass is free of scratches and cleaning marks. As for "trivialities", yes, they can be boring, but as someone suggested they serve to assess personalities, and what revealing personalities we are treated to from time to time. Speaking of trivialities, the percentage of use of one’s lenses has to take the Oscar for uselessness. Next we should report on percentage of time spent fondling our M6s while watching TV. And now that I have dared express my opinion, let the onslaught begin. Joseph Codispoti San Luis Obispo